Tank 300 vs Beijing BJ40 — which off-roader should I choose?

The Tank 300 and BJ40 occupy the same body-on-frame retro off-road segment — locking differentials and genuine low-range transfer cases on both — but they differ on price, powertrain and character. Here is the full, factory-listed comparison of our current units.

Side by side (current listings, real spec)

Reading the numbers

The BJ40 wins on paper for ground clearance, wading depth and approach/departure angles — it is the more hard-core rock-crawling geometry, and it is the lower entry price. The Tank 300 counters with more power, a diesel option with higher peak torque (480 N·m), and a more refined on-road cabin — the better all-rounder if you split time between highway and trail.

How to choose

• Budget-first, hard-core identity: the BJ40 is the lower entry price and carries a distinct military lineage — ideal for buyers who prioritise off-road angles and minimum cost.
• More refinement and powertrain choice: the Tank 300 offers both petrol and diesel and a more modern cabin — ideal for mixed highway-and-trail duty.
• Diesel buyers: both offer diesel; the Tank 300's 2.4T diesel (480 N·m, 9AT) is the stronger tow/haul option of the two.

For the full breakdown — wading depth, design heritage and powertrain options — see our Tank 300 vs Beijing BJ40 comparison.